Log in | Sign Up

Attorney General Raoul Files U.S. Supreme Court Brief Defending States’ Right To Protect Public Health

Illinois AG joins 18 attorneys general in filing amicus brief arguing federal pesticide law should not block state failure-to-warn claims.

Submitted by Office of the Illinois Attorney General
Save
Listen to the story

CHICAGO -Attorney General Kwame Raoul joined a multistate coalition of 18 attorneys general on Wednesday in filing an amicus brief before the U.S. Supreme Court in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, a case that could have sweeping implications for states’ ability to provide access to justice for those injured by pesticide manufacturers.

Get The Latest News!

Don't miss our top stories and need-to-know news everyday in your inbox.

In their brief, Raoul and the coalition urge the Supreme Court to preserve longstanding state laws that allow those who have been wronged by pesticide manufacturers to seek justice. These laws are an essential tool to protect consumers because they encourage manufacturers to adequately warn about potential health risks posed by their products.

Article continues after sponsor message
Limited spots available - advertise with us today!

“Limiting the ability of injured consumers to seek justice through the court system is un-American and only rewards large corporations for failing to warn the public about the potential dangers of their products,” Raoul said. “I will continue to advocate for the rights of consumers to pursue justice under the law.”

Monsanto v. Durnell centers on whether federal pesticide law overrides, or “preempts,” state law claims alleging that manufacturers failed to warn consumers about potential dangers associated with their products. The case arises out of litigation over whether the pesticide manufacturer Monsanto was obligated to warn consumers of the risk that using the pesticide Roundup might increase their risk of developing cancer. Monsanto argues that the federal government’s decision to approve Roundup for sale without such a warning precludes states from permitting juries to consider tort claims that such a warning was required.

In their brief, Raoul and the coalition argue that Congress never intended to eliminate state tort law protections, that state tort law helps further Congress’ intent to protect human and environmental health, and that preempting state tort law would wrongfully take decisions away from states and juries.

Joining Raoul in filing this brief are the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin.

More like this:

Attorney General Raoul, FTC Secure $35 Million Settlement Agreement In Case Against Corteva To Lower Pesticide Prices
4 days ago
Attorney General Raoul Files Lawsuit Challenging Trump Administration’s Rollback Of Fuel Economy Standards
Today
Attorney General Raoul, Bipartisan Coalition Urge Consumers To Claim Compensation For Inflated Generic Drug Prices
Sep 22, 2026
Attorney General Raoul Sues ABC Plumbing, Heating, Cooling & Electric For Unfair, Deceptive Business Practices
Sep 8, 2026
Staunton Man Sentenced to 22 Years for Possessing Child Sexual Abuse Material
3 days ago